@article {bnh-7234, title = {A novel framework for owner driven reconstruction projects to enhance disaster resilience in the long term}, journal = {Disaster Prevention and Management}, volume = {27}, year = {2018}, month = {08/2018}, pages = {421-446}, abstract = {

Purpose

Post-disaster reconstruction poses a double-edged sword to its implementers as it demands addressing survivors{\textquoteright} need for speed as well as meeting the growing expectation to trigger resilience. While an owner-driven housing reconstruction (ODHR), inter-disciplinary and long-term approach has been promoted internationally; however, there is limited research focussed on the long-term impacts (\>10 years after a disaster) of ODHR. Furthermore, there is no one accepted framework for practitioners to guide through the process of ODHR projects to carve pathways for disaster resilience. The purpose of this paper is to assimilate findings{\textemdash}contingent and generalisable{\textemdash}into a novel framework for future change in practice.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper deployed a mixed methods methodology with a comparative case study research method. Two case study projects were from the Indian state of Gujarat, 13 years after the 2001 earthquake and the other two from Bihar, 6 years since the 2008 Kosi river floods. Due to multi-disciplinary nature of research, empirical data collection relied on a mix of social sciences methods including 80 semi-structured interviews, and architectural research methods including the visual analysis of photographs and sketches. Three sample groups of agency members, beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries were purposively selected. Thematic content analysis was used for the data analysis.

Findings

The paper provides empirical insights on how ODHR projects in Indian states of Gujarat and Bihar succeeded at enhancing disaster resilience of communities. It suggests that the civil society organisations acted as {\textquotedblleft}enablers{\textquotedblright} at four stages: envisioning strategically based on systemic understanding, building soft assets including community trust and dignity for social mobilisation prior to, proposing minor modifications to construction technology for its multi-hazard safety as well as cultural relevance, and sustaining capacity building efforts beyond reconstruction completion or beyond one project life-cycle.

Research limitations/implications

The author of this paper cautions that the spiral framework needs further development to make it flexibility and customisable to suit the specifics of a particular context.

Originality/value

The implications of the findings discussed in this paper are primarily for practitioners involved in disaster recovery and development sector. Since prevailing models or frameworks neither incorporate multi-disciplinary approach (demanded by socio-ecological systems resilience concept), nor represent project scale, a novel, four-pronged framework for ODHR has been proposed in this paper for strategic success. The framework has been illustrated in spiral and tabular forms, and has been kept abstract to provide practitioners the much-needed flexibility for adapting it to suit the specifics of a particular context.

}, keywords = {Capacity building; post-disaster reconstruction, disaster resilience, framework, owner-driven reconstruction, project management}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-11-2017-0285}, url = {https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/DPM-11-2017-0285/full/html}, author = {Mittul Vahanvati} }